The Absurdity of a Solid Dome
John Byl, PhD (Astronomy)
According to many Bible scholars, people of the Ancient Near East (ANE) believed that the sky was a fixed solid dome - in which the Sun, moon, and stars were embedded - supported by pillars, or mountains, at the ends of a flat earth. The Israelites are said to have shared this erroneous ANE cosmology, which is allegedly the underlying idea behind the "firmament" or “expanse” (raqia) of Genesis 1.
Not a Fixed Dome but a Rotating Sphere
Were ANE people in general, and the Israelites in particular, really so dense as to believe in a literal solid dome, as pictured above?
Ancient man may have lacked modern technology, such as telescopes and computers, and sophisticated mathematical theories. But he wasn't blind or stupid.
It was obvious to ancient man, as it is to us, that the Sun and Moon move across the sky every day, rising in the East and setting in the West. So the Sun and Moon are clearly not attached to a fixed dome.
What about the stars? At first glance, the stars may seem to be fixed on a dome. Yet, anyone (try it yourself!) watching the stars for a few hours sees them moving through the sky, much like the Sun and Moon. So also the stars are clearly not attached to a stationary dome.
Moreover, the stellar motions clearly have a pronounced pattern. Here is a photo (a time exposure of a few hours) showing star-trails as seen in Fayyum, Egypt (latitude 29.3 degrees North).
The stars near the star Polaris (above the Earth's North pole) travel in complete circles; stars further away rise in the East and set in the West, so that different stars are visible at different times of the night.
In short, the revolving stars seem to be fixed, not to a stationary dome (a semi-sphere), but to a rotating sphere, called the celestial sphere. The celestial sphere surrounds the earth and is not supported by it (see figure).
Although the stars seemed to be fixed to the celestial sphere, it is easily seen that the Moon moves along this sphere roughly once a month, and the Sun once a year, marking off months, seasons, and years (Gen.1:15).
The ancients, keener observers of the night sky than modern ANE scholars, were well aware of such celestial motions. Indeed, the ancient Egyptians marked the beginning of their year by the first dawn appearance of Sirius, the brightest star in the sky.
In line with such simple observational considerations, ANE scholar Margaret Huxley, upon close examination of numerous cuneiform sources, concludes that ancient Mesopotamians thought the sky to be a rotating sphere with a polar axis, rather than a stationary vault.1
The Myth of the Solid Dome
If the solid dome is so contrary to common sense and has no historical basis, how did it come to dominate biblical scholarship?
That tale is related by Randall W. Younker and Richard M. Davidson.2 They find that the idea that the ancient Israelites believed in a solid vault resting on a flat earth emerged during the early 1800s, primarily through the American writer Washington Irving (1783-1859). He propagated the myth that most ancient and medieval people believed in a flat earth, until the time of Columbus.3
Younker and Davidson conclude that, in fact, the majority of early Christian and medieval scholars
believed in a spherical earth, surrounded by celestial spheres that conveyed the sun, moon, stars, and planets in their orbits around the earth. Moreover, the concept of a heavenly vault does not appear in any ancient Babylonian astronomical documents. Rather, this notion was erroneously introduced into the scholarly literature through a mistranslation (1890) of the Enuma Elish by Peter Jensen.
Conclusion
In sum, there is no basis for the notion that ANE people, including the Israelites, believed that the sky was a solid dome.
Rather than reading presumed ancient cosmology into Genesis, we should simply read it on its own terms. Doing so, we see that the raqia of Genesis 1, called heaven (Gen.1:8), is clearly not solid: birds fly in it (Gen.1:20, cf. Deut.4:17), and the sun, moon, and stars move through it (Gen.1:14-18). In fact, the raqia is simply the sky, including the atmosphere and outer space.
Huxley, Margaret. “The Shape of the Cosmos According to Cuneiform Sources.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. 7, no. 2, 1997, pp. 189–198. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/25183348. Accessed 17 June 2021.
"The Myth of The Solid Heavenly Dome: Another Look at The Hebrew." Andrews University Seminary Studies (AUSS) 49.1: 125-147 (2011)
For a detailed account of the flat earth myth, see Jeffrey Burton Russell, Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and the Historians (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1991)
Dr. John Byl, Professor Emeritus of Astronomy at Trinity Western University in Langley, British Columbia, is a distinguished scholar specializing in the intersection of science and Christian theology. His blog, bylogos, serves as a platform for promoting a Christian worldview grounded in the Bible as God's inerrant and fully authoritative Word, in accordance with the Reformed Confessions.
Dr. Byl has authored several insightful works, including "God and Cosmos: A Christian View of Time, Space, and the Universe," "The Divine Challenge: On Matter, Mind, Math, and Meaning," and "How Should Christians Approach Origins?" These publications delve into the philosophical and theological implications of modern cosmology, offering a cohesive, meaningful Christian perspective.
In addition to his written contributions, Dr. Byl is available for speaking engagements on topics covered in his blog, providing valuable insights into the relationship between science and faith.
For more information or to engage with Dr. Byl's work, visit his blog at bylogos.
Good article!